Warlord

Latest news on warlord

Liberian dilemma

Warlord-turned-pastor pleads for forgiveness

Serbia Tracks Fugitive Warlord's Helpers

Authorities search for Karadzic's helpers; probe history of his false identity.

Ex-Congo Warlord At War Crimes Court

Former Congolese Vice President Bemba faces rape and torture charges.

ICC orders Congo warlord release

The ICC orders the release of its first-ever war crimes suspect, DR Congo warlord Thomas Lubanga.

DR Congo warlord 'may go free'

Judges say prosecution errors may lead to Congolese ex-warlord Thomas Lubanga not facing an ICC war crimes trial.

News: Don't Delay

Tycho : Penny Arcade prides itself on delivering a more robust assessment of the ninja lifestyle than our contemporaries, who are content merely to focus on how awesome they are. No-one wants to discuss the aftermath, once the corrupt warlord had been put down. They don't want to think about the hand that holds the certain blade, or the mind that mixes paralytic toxins from grey lichen on a high crag. Their community faces serious challenges and I think it's time they were taken seriously. Plus, Ninja Gaiden II is out, and we wanted to make a comic about ninjas. That's what ...

Warlord Laptops: Not Handled with Care

They often contain irreplaceable evidence but somehow the laptops -- and cell phones -- of captured warlords and rebels in Colombia go missing. Recent case in point: the digital peripherals of 14 suspects extradited this month to the United States to stand trial for drug trafficking were not immediately secured.

Marines Land in Afghanistan -- with Biometrics

A year ago this June, Taliban fighters streamed into the remote town of Chora in southern Afghanistan expecting an easy victory over impoverished villagers. Instead, they met heavy resistance from scores of uniformed Afghan men. Those so-called Afghan National Auxiliary Police (ANAP), all formerly in the service of local warlords, had received two months of training by Dutch and American soldiers and were now the first line of defense against the Taliban. Arming tribesmen was a risky idea. True, this sort of tribal initiative had been effective in Iraq. But NATO commanders feared that Afghan loyalties to their warlords ran too deep. NATO was ?arming people who were not necessarily in line with the [Afghan] government,? U.S. Brig. Gen. Robert Cone told Wired.com. So, last month, NATO fired the auxiliary cops and scrapped the tribal strategy, leaving gaping holes in Afghanistan's defenses. The fix? Marines, of course, armed with fingerprint pads, iris scanners and electronic databases. With these biometric tools, the Marines are planning to recruit new cops who have no ties to tribal warlords. ?We know there are some shadow police and some militia-type police,? Lt. Col. Ray Hall, the Marine commander, said. ?Once we go through the vetting process, we'll have everybody screened ? so that problem should go away.? That means scanning every new recruit's unique iris ?eye prints,? logging their thumb prints and feeding it all into a growing, but still very spotty, national database linked to criminal and intelligence records. If a cop has any known warlord ties, he's disqualified from serving. CIA teams used FBI biometrics while hunting for known Al Qaeda operatives in Afghanistan in 2001, and since then, the military has gathered data on almost every Afghan it comes in regular contact with. There's one more problem. Not all the military databases can talk to one another. ?We haven't standardized,? said Larry Schneider, a Northrop Grumman VP who last year was working on collapsing many biometrics systems into just one. Until everyone is looking at the same data, seditious Afghan cops will probably keep falling through the cracks.

IBD editorial claimed "FARC seems to have an inside line to Obama's campaign"

A March 7 Investor's Business Daily editorial said the following of letters allegedly found on the computer of "Raúl Reyes," the alias of the recently killed spokesman for the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia ("Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarios de Colombia," or FARC) that contain a reference to Sen. Barack Obama: "[T]he little Obama reference within the 15 FARC letters released by the Colombian government signals a disturbing pattern of contacts with rogue actors." IBD further stated that "FARC seems to have an inside line to Obama's campaign." However, the particular letter that mentions Obama offers no indication whatsoever that Reyes or FARC had any "contacts" with the Obama campaign. According to the Associated Press, the letter refers to anonymous "gringos" who, according to Reyes, claimed that Obama will be the next president of the United States and will reject "both the Bush administration's free trade agreement with Colombia and the current military aid program." The letter does not identify the "gringos" in any way. Indeed, IBD itself acknowledged that it did not know "who these 'gringos' are." From the March 7 Investor's Business Daily editorial: The March 1 death strike by the Colombian army against FARC warlord Raul Reyes broke open a trove of contacts in his computer. So why did the name of Barack Obama turn up there? Admittedly, it pales compared with other material from the dead thug's computer -- such as FARC efforts to obtain uranium or [Venezuelan President] Hugo Chavez's $300 million support. But the little Obama reference within the 15 FARC letters released by the Colombian government signals a disturbing pattern of contacts with rogue actors. It's not the first time, and Obama has yet to distance himself. In a Feb. 28 letter, FARC chieftain Raul Reyes cheerily reported to his inner circle that he met "two gringos" who assured him "the new president of their country will be Obama and that they are interested in your compatriots. Obama will not support 'Plan Colombia' nor will he sign the TLC (Free Trade Agreement)." Aside from some interesting possibilities about who these "gringos" are -- a congressional delegation did visit Ecuador and an international leftist "congress" was held in Quito around this time -- the real question is why anyone secretly consorting with FARC would be able to speak for presidential candidate Obama. [...] These aren't idle "gotcha" questions, by the way. Based on his campaign so far, Obama favors meeting and negotiating with rogue leaders without preconditions, passing secret messages to foreign countries at odds with his public positions and tolerating Che-flag wielding leftists among his supporters who advance a radical agenda in his name. Now that FARC seems to have an inside line to Obama's campaign, maybe he ought to come tell voters what he really stands for. The text of the letter, reprinted by El País (Spain), does not identify the "gringos," and Media Matters for America has found no reporting offering any indication as to who they are. Translated to English, the relevant portion of the letter reads: The gringos will ask for an appointment with the minister to request that he communicate to us his interest in discussing these topics. They say that the new president of their country will be Obama and that they are interested in your compatriots. Obama will not support Plan Colombia nor sign the TLC. We responded that we are interested in relations with all governments on equal terms, and that in the case of the United States this requires a public pronouncement expressing their interest in talking with FARC, given their continual war with us. According to a March 5 AP article, the letter, allegedly written by Reyes and addressed to FARC, was found on a "laptop computer seized from the wreckage of a Colombian rebel camp in Ecuador": References to U.S. diplomatic overtures are scintillating, if vague. In a Dec. 11 message to the secretariat, Marquez writes: "If you are in agreement, I can receive Jim and Tucker to hear the proposal of the gringos." Writing two days before his death, Reyes tells his comrades that "the gringos," working through Ecuador's government, are interested "in talking to us on various issues." "They say the new president of their country will be (Barack) Obama," he writes, saying Obama rejects both the Bush administration's free trade agreement with Colombia and the current military aid program. Reyes writes that his response to the Americans was that the United States would have to publicly express these positions. President Bush signed an executive order on November 2, 2001, declaring FARC a terrorist organization. On March 3, Obama's Senate office issued a statement responding to Ecuador and Venezuela moving soldiers to their borders with Colombia and cutting diplomatic ties following Colombian attacks on FARC leaders. According to Obama's statement: "The Colombian people have suffered for more than four decades at the hands of a brutal terrorist insurgency, and the Colombian government has every right to defend itself against the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia. "The presidents of Colombia, Ecuador and Venezuela have a responsibility to ensure that events not spiral out of control, and to peacefully address any disputes through active diplomacy with the help of international actors."