Strict constructionism
Strict constructionism is a philosophy of judicial interpretation and legal philosophy that limits judicial interpretation to the meanings of the actual words and phrases used in law, and not on other sources or inferences. Adherents look strictly at the text in question rather than relying either on legislative intent (as gleaned from contemporaneous commentaries or legislative debate) or on metaphysical ideas such as natural law. Two of the doctrine's most forceful proponents have been Justice Hugo Black and the late Chief Justice William Rehnquist.
Related Topics:
Philosophy - Judicial interpretation - Legal philosophy - Legislative intent - Metaphysical - Natural law - Hugo Black - William Rehnquist
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ Table of Content ~
| ► | Introduction |
| ► | Rationale |
| ► | Criticisms |
| ► | Contrasts with originalism |
| ► | See Also |
| ► | Reference |
~ What's Hot ~
My Sister S Keeper, The Mummy 4 Rise Of The Aztec, Up In The Air, The Book Of Eli, The Karate Kid, Hannah Montana The Movie, The Blind Side, All About Steve, Alvin And The Chipmunks The Squeakquel, The Lovely Bones, Twilight, Avatar, New Moon, The Princess And The Frog, Lethal Weapon 5, The Hangover, The Box, District 9, 500 Days Of Summer, Dear John,
~ Community ~
| ► | History Forum Come and discuss about History, Civilizations, Historical Events and Figures |
| ► | History Web-Ring A community of sites, blogs and forums dedicated to History. Do not hesitate to submit your site. |
and are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Lexicon - Privacy Policy - Spiritus-Temporis.com ©2005.
