Social democracy

Social democracy is a political ideology emerging in the late 19th and early 20th centuries from supporters of Marxism who believed that the transition to a socialist society could be achieved through democratic evolutionary rather than revolutionary means. It emphasises a program of gradual legislative reform of the capitalist system in order to make it more equitable, usually with the theoretical end goal of building a socialist society.

History

Many parties in the second half of the 19th century described themselves as social democratic, such as the British Social Democratic Federation, and the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party. In some cases these were revolutionary socialist or Marxist groups, who were not only seeking to introduce socialism, but also democracy in undemocratic countries.

Related Topics:
19th century - Social Democratic Federation - Russian Social Democratic Labour Party

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The modern social democratic current came into being through a break within the socialist movement in the early 20th century, between two groups holding different views on the ideas of Karl Marx. Many related movements, including pacifism, anarchism, and syndicalism, arose at the same time (often by splitting from the main socialist movement) and had various quite different objections to Marxism. The social democrats, who were the majority of socialists at this time, did not reject Marxism (and in fact claimed to uphold it), but wanted to reform it in certain ways and tone down their criticism of capitalism. They argued that socialism should be achieved through evolution rather than revolution. Such views were strongly opposed by the revolutionary socialists, who argued that any attempt to reform capitalism was doomed to fail, because the reformers would be gradually corrupted and eventually turn into capitalists themselves.

Related Topics:
20th century - Karl Marx - Pacifism - Anarchism - Syndicalism - Marxism

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Two key figures within the socialist movement at this time were César de Paepe of the Belgian International Working Men's Association, and Jean Jaures (who led the French Socialist Party until his assassination on July 31, 1914, one day before the general mobilization of forces that began World War I).

Related Topics:
César de Paepe - International Working Men's Association - Jean Jaures - French Socialist Party - Assassination - July 31 - 1914 - World War I

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Despite their differences, the reformist and revolutionary branches of socialism remained united until the outbreak of World War I. The war proved to be the final straw that pushed the tensions between them to breaking point. The reformist socialists supported their respective national governments in the war, a fact that was seen by the revolutionary socialists as outright treason against the working class (since it betrayed the principle that the workers of all nations should unite in overthrowing capitalism). Bitter arguments ensued within socialist parties, as for example between Eduard Bernstein (reformist socialist) and Rosa Luxemburg (revolutionary socialist) within the SPD in Germany. Eventually, after the Russian Revolution, most of the world's socialist parties fractured. The reformist socialists kept the name "social democrats", while the revolutionary socialists began calling themselves "communists", and soon formed the modern communist movement. (See also Comintern)

Related Topics:
World War I - Working class - Eduard Bernstein - Rosa Luxemburg - SPD - Russian Revolution - Communist - Comintern

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Since the 1920s, differences between social democrats and communists have been constantly growing (although it should be noted that the communists themselves are far from doctrinally unified on the best way to achieve socialism).

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Following the split between social democrats and communists, another split developed within social democracy, between those who still believed it was necessary to abolish capitalism (without revolution) and replace it with a socialist system through democratic parliamentary means, and those who believed that the capitalist system could be retained but simply needed adjustments and improvements such as the nationalization of large businesses, the implementation of social programs (public education, universal healthcare, etc.) and the (partial) redistribution of wealth through a welfare state, in order to make capitalism more humane. Eventually, most social democratic parties have come to be dominated by the latter position and, in the post World War II era, have abandoned any real commitment to abolish capitalism. For instance, in 1959, the Social Democratic Party of Germany adopted the Godesberg Program which rejected class struggle and Marxism. In response, supporters of the former position - that is, those who wish to abolish capitalism rather than merely "improving" it - have taken to calling themselves democratic socialists and have either split from the social democratic parties or formed dissenting factions within them.

Related Topics:
Democratic - Parliamentary - Nationalization - Public education - Universal healthcare - Welfare state - 1959 - Social Democratic Party of Germany - Godesberg Program - Class struggle - Marxism

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Since the late 1980s, most social democratic parties have adopted the "Third Way" - either formally or in practice. Modern social democrats are generally in favor of a mixed economy, which should be mainly capitalistic but with governmental provision of certain social services. Many social democratic parties have shifted emphasis from their traditional goals of social justice to human rights and environmental issues. In this, they are facing increasing challenge from Greens, who view ecology as fundamental to peace, and require reform of money supply and safe trade measures to ensure ecological integrity. In Germany in particular, Greens, Social Democrats, and other left-wing parties have cooperated in so-called Red-Green Alliances.

Related Topics:
1980s - Third Way - Mixed economy - Capitalistic - Greens - Money supply - Safe trade - Red-Green Alliance

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

A number of the policies advocated by social democrats have become permanent in the countries where they have been implemented, in the sense that they are now supported by all mainstream political parties. Such policies include the progressive income tax and publicly funded medicine. Other measures, however, (such as tuition-free university education) have sometimes been overturned, occasionally by social democratic governments themselves. Social democrats have, for the most part, also abandoned the concept of nationalization and have instead fully or partly privatised state owned industry and services. These changes have been seen in the governments of Bob Hawke and Paul Keating in Australia, that of Tony Blair in the United Kingdom, Gerhard Schröder in Germany, Göran Persson in Sweden, and the Rogernomics of David Lange and Finance Minister Roger Douglas in New Zealand.

Related Topics:
Progressive income tax - Publicly funded medicine - University - Nationalization - Bob Hawke - Paul Keating - Australia - Tony Blair - United Kingdom - Gerhard Schröder - Germany - Göran Persson - Sweden - Rogernomics - David Lange - Roger Douglas - New Zealand

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In general, these reversals in policy are supported more by the party leadership and far less by the average members of social democratic parties and their voter base. Many have claimed that the present leadership of the social democratic movement is corrupt and has abandoned social democracy in practice; to which 'modernizing' social democrats counter that their 'new' social democracy is an adaptation of those historic principles to the reality of the modern world.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

When discussing the recent reversal of social democratic policy it is important to bear in mind that what many people refer to as 'traditional' social democracy is now generally regarded to have been possible only because of the prevailing international climate - the post-war Bretton Woods consensus. What is of interest to contemporary social democrats, therefore, is why this consensus itself collapsed, whether it would be possible to rebuild it, and how.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Some social democratic parties have at some point in their history been supporters of free trade, on the grounds that limiting international trade harms the poor by raising prices and reducing incomes: for example the Labour Party first came to government in the UK in 1924 after their opponents had lost the 1923 election by proposing protectionism.

Related Topics:
Free trade - 1923 election

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

See also History of Socialism.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~