Roman Emperor


 
 
Roman Emperor

"Roman Emperor" is the title historians use to refer to rulers of the Roman Empire, after the epoch conventionally named the Roman Republic. In ancient Rome there was no actual title of "Roman Emperor", and there was never a single office corresponding to it. Rather, the title "Roman Emperor" is a convenient shorthand for a complicated collection of offices and powers.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Discussion of Roman Emperors involves a high degree of historian's editorial discretion, for the Romans themselves did not share the modern understanding of the monarchical concepts of "empire" and "emperor". The Roman Empire had kept all the political institutions and traditions of the Roman Republic, including the Senate and assemblies.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In general, the Emperors cannot truly be described as "de jure" rulers (nominally the Emperor was merely primus inter pares), and many were not "de facto" rulers either (Emperors were frequently themselves figureheads for powerful bureaucrats, functionaries, women, and generals).

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The present article discusses the nature of the imperial dignity, and its dynastic development throughout the history of the Empire.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

~ Table of Content ~

Introduction
Overview
Titles and Positions
The lineages and epochs
See also
External links
Further reading
 


 

~ Related Subjects ~

Ancient Roman (1) - Figurehead (1) - Primus inter pares (1) - Roman Republic (19th century) (1) - Roman Republic (18th century) (1) - Caesar Augustus (1) - Empire (1) - Roman Republic (1) - Roman Empire (1) - Assemblies (1) - Senate (1) - Emperor (1) -
 

~ Community ~

History Forum
Come and discuss about History, Civilizations, Historical Events and Figures
History Web-Ring
A community of sites, blogs and forums dedicated to History. Do not hesitate to submit your site.