Necessity
In criminal law, necessity is a possible excuse for breaking the law. Defendants who use this defense are arguing that they should not be held liable for a crime, since the actions taken were, for some reason or other, "necessary". Most common law jurisdictions do not allow this defense to be used in case of murder.
England
In an early trial for which this defense was used, Regina v. Dudley & Stephens (1884) 14 QBD 273 DC, two shipwrecked sailors decided to eat a cabin boy. The court ruled that cannibalizing the individual was not necessary; the sailors were found guilty of murder. Other courts have ruled, in cases where the eaten individual had died of "natural causes" and starvation was an issue, that cannibalism was acceptable.
Related Topics:
Trial - Regina v. Dudley & Stephens - 1884 - 14 QBD 273 DC - Shipwreck - Sailor - Eat - Cabin boy - Court - Cannibalizing - Guilt - Murder - Natural causes - Starvation
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ Table of Content ~
| ► | Introduction |
| ► | England |
| ► | Canada |
~ What's Hot ~
~ Community ~
| ► | History Forum Come and discuss about History, Civilizations, Historical Events and Figures |
| ► | History Web-Ring A community of sites, blogs and forums dedicated to History. Do not hesitate to submit your site. |
and are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Lexicon - Privacy Policy - Spiritus-Temporis.com ©2005.