Muttiah Muralitharan

For more coverage of cricket, go to the .

Controversy of bowling action

Muralitharan's bowling action is controversial amongst many purists, as to some it appears that it contravenes the laws of the game by straightening the arm in the course of the delivery. This is despite his action being exonerated unanimously by an international panel consisting of members from every Test playing nation. The controversy came to a head after Australian umpire Darrell Hair called a "no ball" for an illegal action seven times during the Boxing Day Test match in Melbourne, Australia, in 1995. After discussions between the Australian Cricket Board and the Board of Control for Cricket in Sri Lanka, Hair umpired no further games involving Sri Lanka in the season. Reaction to Hair's actions was mixed. He was widely criticised in Sri Lanka and elsewhere, but some, particularly in Australia, felt that it was long overdue. It would be simplistic to assume that opinion was divided purely by nationality though, with Australia's greatest ever cricketer, Sir Donald Bradman quoted as saying it was the "worst example of umpiring that (he had) witnessed, and against everything the game stands for. Clearly Murali does not throw the ball". http://www.icc-cricket.com/db/ARCHIVE/CRICKET_NEWS/2004/DEC/121997_SL_07DEC2004.html http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/12/04/1101923389044.html?oneclick=true

Related Topics:
Umpire - Darrell Hair - No ball - Boxing Day - Melbourne - 1995 - Australian Cricket Board - Board of Control for Cricket in Sri Lanka - Donald Bradman

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Muralitharan was later no-balled for throwing by Australian umpires Ross Emerson and Tony McQuillan in a one-day international (ODI) against the West Indies, in Brisbane, Australia, later in the same summer. Following this season, Muralitharan underwent biomechanical tests in Hong Kong and Australia under the supervision of bowling experts, who cleared his action as legal, citing a congenital defect in Muralitharan's arm which makes him incapable of straightening it, but giving the appearance of the arm straightening in the bowling action. http://www-ieem.ust.hk/dfaculty/ravi/murali01.html

Related Topics:
One-day international - West Indies - Brisbane - Hong Kong - Congenital defect

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Doubts about Muralitharan's action persisted, particularly in Australia. In 1999, he was once again called for throwing by umpire Ross Emerson in an ODI against England, at the Adelaide Oval in Australia. The Sri Lankan team almost abandoned the match, but after instructions from the president of the BCCSL (relayed to captain Arjuna Ranatunga by mobile phone) the game resumed.

Related Topics:
1999 - Ross Emerson - Adelaide Oval - Arjuna Ranatunga

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Muralitharan took his 500th Test wicket in the second Test against Australia in Kandy on March 16, 2004. At the end of the series his doosra delivery was officially called into question by match referee Chris Broad and Muralitharan was entered into a two-stage remedial process for bowlers with suspect actions under the supervision of the International Cricket Council ('ICC'). The delivery was examined by biomechanical experts who found it to exceed the current tolerance limit, regarding the degree of bend in the arm, of 5 degrees for slow bowlers. Australian prime minister John Howard weighed in, controversially labelling Murali a 'chucker'. Despite this he won accolades from former Australian captain, Steve Waugh, who said he was "the Don Bradman of bowling". Waugh went on to say that he felt Muralitharan's action was perfectly legal.

Related Topics:
March 16 - 2004 - Doosra - Chris Broad - International Cricket Council - Prime minister - John Howard - Steve Waugh - Don Bradman

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Muralitharan has subsequently been videotaped bowling while wearing an arm brace that prevents the straightening of the arm in an attempt to clear his name once and for all. It appears unlikely that this will ever happen, as his critics maintain that only his bowling during real matches can be considered and that it's possible he changes his action when under scrutiny. However experts who have viewed such tests have maintained that this is not the case. Former Indian spinner Bishan Bedi has been particularly vocal in his criticism of the testing, asking, "Why should a bowler be allowed to chuck because he has a defective arm?" and comparing Muralitharan's action with that of "a javelin thrower".

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

There is speculation that the match referee's actions were an attempt to de-rail Muralitharan's attempt to become the all-time leading wicket taker. Former players like Arjuna Ranatunga believe this to be a "white conspiracy" with some Australians and Englishmen wishing to get the name Muralitharan expunged from cricket records. Ranatunga asserted that Muralitharan was being picked on because of his skin colour. Ranatunga's actions were seen by some as an attempt to deflect inquiries over Muralitharan's action by branding those making such claims with the pejorative term "racist". It should be noted that Muralitharan has many powerful allies in Australia and England. Examples include Mark Nichollas, Bruce Yardley and Steve Waugh, all of whom have supported Muralitharan publicly. It is claimed that Sir Donald Bradman also spoke very highly of Muralitharan.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

An extensive ICC study, the results of which were released in November 2004, was conducted to investigate the 'chucking issue'. A panel of former Test players, with the assistance of several biomechanical experts revealed that 99% of all bowlers bent their arms when bowling. Only one bowler in the world (Ramnaresh Sarwan) did not transgress the rules when tested. Muralitharan's off break and top spinner were deemed within the rules (2 to 5 degree straightening), but the Doosra was still an area of concern. The flexion measured when bowling the Doosra was not excessive, however, considering the amount of flexion in the actions of many other bowlers. The panel has recommended that the current law be expanded to extend the tolerance limit on the degree of bending to 15 degrees for all bowlers. If these findings are implemented then Muralitharan's doosra would be deemed legal.

Related Topics:
Ramnaresh Sarwan - Off break - Top spinner

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

This scientific evidence has gone a long way to convincing many of Muralitharan's former critics that his action is legal. Two vocal critics of Murilatharan's action were former Test cricketers; West Indian Michael Holding, a member of ICC's Advisory Panel on Illegal Deliveries and Australian Dean Jones. Holding had been quoted as being in "110% agreement" with Bedi regarding Muralitharan's action and Jones had said "by my interpretation, I think he throws it". Following the ICC study and the video analysis of Muralitharan's action while wearing the brace, they have both retracted their comments (see article). Holding, a member of the panel that conducted the ICC study proclaimed, "The scientific evidence is overwhelming".

Related Topics:
Michael Holding - Dean Jones

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~