Hubert Languet

Hubert Languet (Viteaux (21 miles west of Dijon) 1518–Antwerp September 30 1581) was a French diplomat and reformer.

Related Topics:
Viteaux - Dijon - 1518 - Antwerp - September 30 - 1581 - French - Diplomat - Reformer

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

He entered the University of Poitiers in order to study law but he was interested also in theology, history, and science and political science. He visited the universities of Padua and Bologna, and traveled in Italy and Spain.

Related Topics:
University of Poitiers - Law - Theology - History - Science - Political science - Padua - Bologna - Italy - Spain

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

He was greatly influenced by Melanchthon's Loci theologici, which put an end to his doubts. In 1549 Languet went to Wittenberg, where he was kindly received by Melanchthon as a guest, frequently accompanying him on his travels and being on intimate terms with his friends. Expelled from France by the persecutions of the Protestants, he settled at Wittenberg, spending the winters there, but making extensive journeys in the summer and fall.

Related Topics:
Melanchthon - 1549 - Wittenberg

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In 1559 Languet, on the recommendation of Melanchthon, entered the service of the elector of Saxony as diplomatic agent, which position he held until 1577. The elector sent him to various courts: to Paris, Vienna, Prague, Frankfurt, Cologne, and the Netherlands.

Related Topics:
1559 - Elector - Saxony - 1577 - Paris - Vienna - Prague - Frankfurt - Cologne - Netherlands

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

As a friend of Melanchthon he opposed the growing party of strict Lutherans; but still he did everything in his power to reconcile the opposing parties, even trying to effect the recognition of the French Huguenots at the diet of Frankfurt in 1562, but without success. In May 1561, he went to France in order to bring about a closer connection between the German princes and the French Protestants, and was present at the Religious Conference of Poissy. In 1562 he was in Antwerp; the following years were spent in diplomatic journeys to France and back to Saxony.

Related Topics:
Huguenot - 1562 - 1561 - Conference of Poissy

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In 1571 the elector sent him together with the ambassadors of other Protestant princes of Germany to King Charles IX of France to congratulate him on the peace of Saint Germain. On this occasion Languet advocated the equal recognition of both confessions, but the answer was the night of Saint Bartholomew; having narrowly escaped death, he left France in October 1572, and returned there only once more, shortly before his death.

Related Topics:
1571 - Germany - Charles IX of France - Saint Germain - Saint Bartholomew - 1572

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

From 1573 to 1576 he was at the court of Emperor Maximilian II, whom he accompanied on his various journeys. With the death of Maximilian II in 1576 his connection with the court of Vienna was dissolved. The bitter feelings

Related Topics:
1573 - 1576 - Emperor Maximilian II

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

against him as the friend of Melanchthon and a Calvinist caused him to ask for dismissal from the court. The elector granted his desire, but

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

continued his salary. In 1577 he went to Cologne in order to be nearer to the Netherlands, as he was greatly attracted by William of Orange.

Related Topics:
1577 - William of Orange

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The leading idea of his diplomacy was that of religious and civil liberty for the protection and expansion of Protestantism. He did everything in his power to advance the union of the Protestant churches. The correspondence with the Elector August of Saxony and with Mordeisen were edited by T. P. Ludovicus under the title Arcana seculi xvi. (Halle, 1699). Other collections of letters are Epistolae politicae et historicae ad P. Sydnaeum

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

(Frankfort, 1633); Epistolae ad J. Camerarium, Patrem et filium (Groningen, 1646).

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

His chief work is Vindiciae contra tyrannos (Edinburgh , 1579). The book is divided into four parts each of which proposes and answers a question:

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

• Must God in a case of dispute be obeyed rather than a ruler?
• May a ruler who violates the law of God and devastates the Church, be opposed?
• How far, and with what right may it be allowed to oppose a ruler who suppresses or destroys the state?
• Have neighboring rulers a right to assist a ruler oppressed by his subjects?