Fraser Institute

The Fraser Institute is a fiscally conservative Canadian think tank. Its mandate is to advocate for competitive markets to better provide for the economic and social well-being of all Canadians. It is very critical of government spending, high taxes, and government deficits. While economically right-wing, it does not support social conservatism. It supports free trade, closer integration of the Canadian economy with the United States, and privatization of government services. The Fraser Institute is skeptical of the need for regulatory action against global warming. http://www.fraserinstitute.ca/environment/index.asp?snav=en

Controversy

Though little known at the time of its founding, the Institute has been a source of controversy since its beginning. It was founded by Walker with a grant from forestry giant MacMillan Bloedel Limited, at a time when MacMillan-Bloedel was in conflict with B.C.'s left-wing NDP government.

Related Topics:
MacMillan Bloedel Limited - NDP

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Critics of the Institute and other similar agenda-driven think tanks have noted the Fraser Institute's reports, studies and surveys are usually not subject to standard academic peer review or the scholarly method. The accuracy and reliability of the information they produce is therefore often questionable. The Institute also dedicates considerable energy and funding to actively promote their findings and their agenda to broadcast and print media, a practice not followed by most research foundations or in the research work of university departments.

Related Topics:
Peer review - Scholarly method

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Others point out that some of their research, like the Economic Freedom of the World report, have been used in many papers that have been peer-reviewed. http://www.freetheworld.com/papers.html Many other organizations like Greenpeace also publish research often not peer-reviewed and actively try promote their findings and agenda.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In 1999, the Fraser Institute was attacked by health professionals and scientists for sponsoring two conferences on the tobacco industry, entitled "Junk Science, Junk Policy? Managing Risk and Regulation" and "Should government butt out? The pros and cons of tobacco regulation." Critics charged the Institute was associating itself with the tobacco industry's many attempts to discredit authentic scientific work.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The group has also come under fire from social conservatives, who feel it is too liberal in matters of social policy. For example, the Institute favors the legalization of marijuana.

Related Topics:
Social conservatives - Marijuana

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~