Cantor's diagonal argument
:Note: in order to fully understand this article you may want to refer to the set theory portion of the table of mathematical symbols.
Why this does not work on integers
People sometimes think that the above proof can be adapted to the integers to show that they too are uncountable. They try to do this by dropping the decimal point in the expansions above. The trouble is that an infinite sequence of non-zero digits does not represent an integer. This is the reason for step (7) above.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ Table of Content ~
| ► | Introduction |
| ► | Real numbers |
| ► | Why this does not work on integers |
| ► | General sets |
| ► | External links |
~ What's Hot ~
The Hangover, Alvin And The Chipmunks The Squeakquel, My Sister S Keeper, The Karate Kid, 500 Days Of Summer, The Blind Side, Hannah Montana The Movie, Fantastic Mr Fox, 2012, New Moon, Percy Jackson The Olympians The Titan S Curse, Harry Potter And The Half Blood Prince, The Goods Live Hard Sell Hard, Dear John, Madagascar 3, Up In The Air, The Mummy 4 Rise Of The Aztec, All About Steve, The Princess And The Frog, Avatar,
~ Community ~
| ► | History Forum Come and discuss about History, Civilizations, Historical Events and Figures |
| ► | History Web-Ring A community of sites, blogs and forums dedicated to History. Do not hesitate to submit your site. |
and are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Lexicon - Privacy Policy - Spiritus-Temporis.com ©2005.
