Austria-Hungary

Historiography

Historical views of Austria-Hungary have varied throughout the 20th century:

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Historians in the early part of the century tended to have emotional and/or personal involvement with the issues surrounding Austria-Hungary. Nationalist historians tended to view the Habsburg polity as despotic and obsolete. Other scholars, usually associated with the old government, became apologists for the traditional leadership and tried to explain their policies.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

• Major writers from the early period who remain influential include: Oskar Jászi and Josef Redlich.

Subsequent experience of the region's inter-war "Balkanization", of Nazi occupation, and then of Soviet domination, led to a more sympathetic interpretation of the Empire, based primarily in a large exiled community in the United States. Meanwhile, Marxist historians still tended to judge the Empire in a negative way.

Related Topics:
Balkanization - Nazi - Soviet

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

• Major scholars of this period include: C. A Macartney, Robert A. Kann and Arthur J. May.

One controversy among historians remains: whether the Empire faced inevitable collapse as the result of a decades-long decline; or whether it would have survived in some form in the absence of military defeat in World War I.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

• Alan Sked has advanced the view that, "to speak of decline and fall with regard to the Monarchy is simply misleading: it fell because it lost a major war." (The Decline and Fall of the Habsburg Empire 1815–1918)
• David F. Good supports Sked's view.
• Others, such as Solomon Wank, remain skeptical.