Aurangzeb

Abu Muzaffar Muhiuddin Muhammad Aurangzeb Alamgir (November 3, 1618 – March 3, 1707), usually known as Aurangzeb, but also sometimes as Alamgir I, was the ruler of the Mughal Empire from 1658 until 1707. He was and is a very controversial figure in Indian history.

Commentary by recent historians

Wolpert

Stanley Wolpert writes in his New History of India ISBN 0195166779 (Oxford, 2003)

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:...Yet the conquest of the Deccan, to which devoted the last 26 years of his life, was in many ways a Pyrrhic victory, costing an estimated hundred thousand lives a year during its last decade of futile chess game warfare...The expense in gold and rupees can hardly be accurately estimated. 's moving capital alone- a city of tents 30 miles in circumference, some 250 bazaars, with a 1/2 million camp followers, 50,000 camels and 30,000 elephants, all of whom had to be fed, stripped peninsular India of any and all of its surplus gain and wealth... Not only famine but bubonic plague arose...Even had ceased to understand the purpose of it all by the time he..was nearing 90... "I came alone and I go as a stranger. I do not know who I am, nor what I have been doing," the dying old man confessed to his son in Feb 1707. "I have sinned terribly, and I do not know what punishment awaits me."

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Manas Group, UCLA

:A year after he assumed power in 1658, Aurangzeb appointed muhtasaibs, or censors of public morals, from the ranks of the ulema or clergy in every large city. He was keen that the sharia or Islamic law be followed everywhere, and that practices abhorrent to Islam, such as the consumption of alcohol and gambling, be disallowed in public...

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:It can scarcely be doubted, once the historical evidence is weighed, that the religious policies of Aurangzeb were discriminatory... ittle, if any, evidence has been offered to suggest how far the conversion of Hindus took place, and whether there was any official policy beyond one of mere encouragement that led to the conversion of Hindus. Then, as now, conversion would have been more attractive to the vast number of Hindus living under the tyranny of caste oppression...he kind of inducements that Aurangzeb offered substantially different from the inducements that modern, purportedly secular, politicians offer...

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:Hindus employed...under Aurangzeb's reign rose from 24.5% in the time of his father Shah Jahan to 33% in the fourth decade of his own rule.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~