Microsoft Store
 

Attrition warfare


 

Attrition warfare is a strategic concept that to win a war, one's enemy must be worn down to the point of collapse by continuous losses in personnel and matériel. The war will eventually be won by the side with greater such reserves.

Related Topics:
Strategic - War - Matériel

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

A well-known example of this is during World War I on the Western Front, where both forces found themselves in static defensive positions in trenches that ran from the Swiss Alps to the English Channel. For years without any opportunity for maneuvers, the only way the commanders thought they could defeat the enemy was to continually attack each other head on and to grind the other down.

Related Topics:
World War I - Western Front - Trench - Swiss Alps - English Channel

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The Vietnam War has frequently been called a war of attrition, the American strategy being to wear down the enemy until he lost his "will to fight." Ultimately, this strategy would prove unsuccessful due to the asymmetrical nature of the conflict and the profound underestimation by the United States of the determination of the Vietnamese people to defeat their enemy no matter the cost.

Related Topics:
Vietnam War - Asymmetrical

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Most military theorists through history have viewed attrition warfare as something to be avoided. In the sense that attrition warfare represents an attempt to grind down an opponent through superior numbers, it represents the opposite of the usual principles of war, where one attempts to achieve decisive victories through maneuver, concentration of force, surprise, and so forth. On the other hand, a side which perceives itself to be at a marked disadvantage in maneuver warfare or unit tactics may deliberately seek out attrition warfare to neutralize its opponent's advantages. One example would be the later part of the American Civil War, where Ulysses S. Grant pushed the Confederate Army continually in spite of losses, confident that the Union's supplies and manpower could overwhelm the Confederacy even if the casualty ratio was unfavorable. That proved to be the case.

Related Topics:
American Civil War - Ulysses S. Grant

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

If the sides are evenly matched or nearly so, the outcome of a war of attrition may be a Pyrrhic victory.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

 

~ Table of Content ~

Introduction
See also:

 

 

~ What's Hot ~


~ Community ~

History Forum
Come and discuss about History, Civilizations, Historical Events and Figures
History Web-Ring
A community of sites, blogs and forums dedicated to History. Do not hesitate to submit your site.