Aristotle

Aristotle (Greek: Αριστοτέλης

Methodology

Aristotle defines philosophy in terms of essence, saying that philosophy is "the science of the universal essence of that which is actual". Plato had defined it as the "science of the idea", meaning by idea what we should call the unconditional basis of phenomena. Both pupil and master regard philosophy as concerned with the universal; Aristotle, however, finds the universal in particular things, and called it the essence of things, while Plato finds that the universal exists apart from particular things, and is related to them as their prototype or exemplar. For Aristotle, therefore, philosophic method implies the ascent from the study of particular phenomena to the knowledge of essences, while for Plato philosophic method means the descent from a knowledge of universal ideas to a contemplation of particular imitations of those ideas. In a certain sense, Aristotle's method is both inductive and deductive, while Plato's is essentially deductive.

Related Topics:
Essence - Actual - Idea - Phenomena - Universal - Particular - Prototype - Exemplar - Inductive - Deductive

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In Aristotle's terminology, the term natural philosophy corresponds to the phenomena of the natural world, which include: motion, light, and the laws of physics. Many centuries later these subjects would later become the basis of modern science, as studied through the scientific method. The term philosophy is distinct from metaphysics, which is what moderns term philosophy.

Related Topics:
Motion - Light - Laws of physics - Scientific method - Philosophy

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In the larger sense of the word, he makes philosophy coextensive with reasoning, which he also called "science". Note, however, that his use of the term science carries a different meaning than that which is covered by the scientific method. "All science (dianoia) is either practical, poetical or theoretical." By practical science he understands ethics and politics; by poetical, he means the study of poetry and the other fine arts; while by theoretical philosophy he means physics, mathematics, and metaphysics.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The last, philosophy in the stricter sense, he defines as "the knowledge of immaterial being," and calls it "first philosophy", "the theologic science" or of "being in the highest degree of abstraction." If logic, or, as Aristotle calls it, Analytic, be regarded as a study preliminary to philosophy, we have as divisions of Aristotelian philosophy (1) Logic; (2) Theoretical Philosophy, including Metaphysics, Physics, Mathematics, (3) Practical Philosophy; and (4) Poetical Philosophy.

Related Topics:
Immaterial - Analytic - Logic - Metaphysics - Physics - Mathematics

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Aristotle's logic

Main article: Aristotelian logic

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

History

Aristotle "says that 'on the subject of reasoning' he 'had nothing else on an earlier date to speak about'" (Bocheński, 1951). However, Plato reports that syntax was thought of before him, by Prodikos of Keos, who was concerned by the right use of words. Logic seems to have emerged from dialectics, the earlier philosophers used concepts like reductio ad absurdum as a rule when discussing, but never understood its logical implications. Even Plato had difficulties with logic. Although he had the idea of constructing a system for deduction, he was never able to construct one. Instead, he relied on his dialectic, which was a confusion between different sciences and methods (Bocheński, 1951). Plato thought that deduction would simply follow from premises, so he focused on having good premises so that the conclusion would follow. Later on, Plato realised that a method for obtaining the conclusion would be beneficial. Plato never obtained such a method, but his best attempt was published in his book Sophist, where he introduced his division method (Rose, 1968).

Related Topics:
1951 - Syntax - Prodikos of Keos - Dialectics - Reductio ad absurdum - Deduction - Dialectic - Premise - Conclusion - 1968

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Analytics and the Organon

What we call today Aristotelian logic, Aristotle himself would have labelled analytics. The term logic he reserved to mean dialectics. Most of Aristotle's work is probably not authentic, since it was most likely edited by students and later lecturers. The logical works of Aristotle were compiled into six books at about the time of Christ:

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

• Categories
• On Interpretation
• Prior Analytics
• Posterior Analytics
• Topics
• On Sophistical Refutations

The order of the books (or the teachings from which they are composed) is not certain, but this list was derived from analysis of Aristotle's writings. There is one volume of Aristotle's concerning logic not found in the Organon, namely the fourth book of Metaphysics. (Bocheński, 1951).

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Modal logic

Aristotle is also the creator of syllogisms with modalities (modal logic). The word modal refers to the word 'modes', explaining the fact that modal logic deals with the modes of truth. Aristotle introduced the qualification of 'necessary' and 'possible' premises. He constructed a logic which helped in the evaluation of truth but which was very difficult to interpret. (Rose, 1968).

Related Topics:
Syllogism - Modal logic - Truth

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

See also

• Non-Aristotelian logic

Aristotelian science

Aristotelian discussions about science had only been qualitative, not quantitative. By the modern definition of the term, Aristotelian philosophy was not science, as this worldview did not attempt to probe how the world actually worked through experiment. For example, in his book The history of animals he claimed that human males have more teeth than female. Had he only made some observations, he would have found out that this claim is false.

Related Topics:
Worldview - Experiment - The history of animals

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Rather, based on what one's senses told one, Aristotelian philosophy then depended upon the assumption that man's mind could elucidate all the laws of the universe, based on simple observation (without experimentation) through reason alone.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

One of the reasons for this was that Aristotle held that physics was about changing objects with a reality of their own, whereas mathematics was about unchanging objects without a reality of their own. In this philosophy, he could not imagine that there was a relationship between them.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In contrast, today's "science" assumes that thinking alone often leads people astray, and therefore one must compare one's ideas to the actual world through experimentation; only then can one see if one's ideas are based in reality. This position is known as empiricism or the scientific method.

Related Topics:
Empiricism - Scientific method

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Aristotle's Four Causes

Aristotle names four "causes" of things, but the word cause (Greek: {{polytonic|αἰτἱα}}, aitia) is not used in the modern sense of "cause and effect", under which causes are events or states of affairs. Rather, the four causes are like different ways of explaining something:

Related Topics:
Cause - Greek

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

; The Material Cause: This is the material that makes up an object, for example, "the bronze and silver ... are causes of the statue and the bowl."

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

; The Formal Cause: This is the blueprint or the idea commonly held of what an object should be. Aristotle says, "The form is the account (and the genera of the account) of the essence (for instance, the cause of an octave is the ratio two to one, and in general number), and the parts that are in the account."

Related Topics:
Formal Cause - Genera - Essence

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

; The Efficient Cause: This is the person who makes an object, or "unmoved movers" (gods) who move nature. For example, "a father is a cause of his child; and in general the producer is a cause of the product and the initiator of the change is a cause." This is closest to the modern definition of "cause".

Related Topics:
Efficient Cause - Gods

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

; The Final Cause: The final cause or telos is the purpose or end that something is supposed to serve. This includes "all the intermediate steps that are for the end ... for example, slimming, purging, drugs, or instruments are for health; all of these are for the end, though they differ in that some are activities while others are instruments."

Related Topics:
Final Cause - Telos

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

An example of an artifact that has all four causes would be a table, which has material causes (wood and nails), a formal cause (the blueprint, or a generally agreed idea of what tables are), an efficient cause (the carpenter), and a final cause (using it to dine on).

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Aristotle argues that natural objects such as an "individual man" have all four causes. The material cause of an individual man would be the flesh and bone that make up an individual man. The formal cause would be the blueprint of man, that which is used as a guide to create an individual man and to keep him in a certain state called man. The efficient cause of an individual man would be the father of that man, or in the case of all men an ?unmoved mover? who breathed (anima: breath) into the soul (anima: soul) of man. The final cause of man would be as Aristotle stated, ?Now we take the human?s function to be a certain kind of life, and take this life to be the soul?s activity and actions that express reason. Hence the excellent man?s function is to do this finely and well. Each function is completed well when its completion expresses the proper virtue. Therefore the human good turns out to be the souls? activity that expresses virtue.?

Related Topics:
Soul - Virtue

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

See also

• Aristotelian view of God

The difference between natural objects and artifacts

The difference between natural objects and an artifact is that natural objects have self movement. Aristotle defined the difference between a natural object and an artifact when he stated, ?In contrast to these, a bed, a cloak, or any other artifact-insofar as it is described as such i.e., as a bed, a cloak, or whatever, and to the extent that it is a product of a craft-has no innate impulse to change; but insofar as it is coincidentally made of stone or earth or a mixture of these, it has an innate impulse to change and just to that extent. This is because a nature is a type of principle and cause of motion and stability within those things to which it primarily belongs in their own right and not coincidentally.? The natural objects are changed to artifacts through crafts but they have an innate impulse of self movement to convert through time to their natural state, and they will all turn into that state when all animals with reason are extinct from the earth.

Related Topics:
Self movement - Natural object - Artifact - Innate - Impulse

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Gravity

Main article: Aristotelian theory of gravity

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Aristotle's ethics

Main article: Nicomachean Ethics

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Although Aristotle wrote several works on ethics, the major one was the Nicomachean Ethics, which is considered one of Aristotle's great works; it discusses virtues. The ten books which comprise it are based on notes from his lectures at the Lyceum and were either edited by or dedicated to Aristotle's son, Nicomachus.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle focuses on the importance of continually behaving virtuously and developing virtue rather than committing specific good actions. This can be opposed to Kantian ethics, in which the primary focus is on individual action. Nicomachean Ethics emphasizes the importance of context to ethical behaviour — what might be right in one situation might be wrong in another. Aristotle believed that happiness is the end of life and that as long as a person is striving for goodness, good deeds will result from that struggle, making the person virtuous and therefore happy.

Related Topics:
Behaving - Virtue - Kantian - Happiness - Goodness

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~