Appeasement
Appeasement is a strategic manoeuver, based on either pragmatism, fear of war, or moral conviction, that leads to acceptance of imposed conditions in lieu of armed resistance. Since World War II, the term has gained a negative connotation, in politics and in general, of weakness and cowardice.
Different views on appeasement
The meaning of the term "appeasement" has changed throughout the years. According to Paul Kennedy in his Strategy and Diplomacy, 1983, appeasement is "the policy of settling international quarrels by admitting and satisfying grievances through rational negotiation and compromise, thereby avoiding the resort to an armed conflict which would be expensive, bloody and possibly dangerous."
Related Topics:
Paul Kennedy - Strategy and Diplomacy - 1983
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Further quotes:
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"At bottom, the old appeasement was a mood of hope, Victorian in its optimism, Burkean in its belief that societies evolved from bad to good and that progress could only be for the better. The new appeasement was a mood of fear, Hobbesian in its insistence upon swallowing the bad in order to preserve some remnant of the good, pessimistic in its belief that Nazism was there to stay and, however horrible it might be, should be accepted as a way of life with which Britain ought to deal." Martin Gilbert, The Roots of Appeasement, 1968.
Related Topics:
Victorian - Burke - Hobbes - Nazism - Britain - Martin Gilbert - 1968
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
To appease: "to try to conciliate or bribe (a potential aggressor) by making concessions, frequently with implication of sacrifice of principles" Concise Oxford Dictionary, 1963 edition.
Related Topics:
Concise Oxford Dictionary - 1963
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"Each course brought it's share of disadvantages: there was only a choice of evils. The crisis in the British global position by this time was such that it was, in the last resort, insoluble, in the sense that there was no good or proper solution." Paul Kennedy, Strategy and Diplomacy, 1983.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"The word in its normal meaning connotes the pacific settlement of disputes; in the meaning usually applied to the period of Chamberlain's premiership, it has come to indicate something sinister, the granting from fear or cowardice of unwarranted concessions in order to buy temporary peace at someone else's expense." D.N. DIlks, Appeasement Revisited, Journal of Contemporary History, 1972.
Related Topics:
Chamberlain - 1972
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ Table of Content ~
| ► | Introduction |
| ► | Different views on appeasement |
| ► | Appeasement of Hitler |
| ► | Appeasement's effect on the Second World War |
| ► | The theme of appeasement in contemporary U.S. foreign policy |
| ► | External links |
| ► | Useful textbooks (especially A-level-oriented) |
~ What's Hot ~
~ Community ~
| ► | History Forum Come and discuss about History, Civilizations, Historical Events and Figures |
| ► | History Web-Ring A community of sites, blogs and forums dedicated to History. Do not hesitate to submit your site. |
and are licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License.
Lexicon - Privacy Policy - Spiritus-Temporis.com ©2005.