Anselm of Canterbury

Saint Anselm of Canterbury (1033 or 1034 – April 21 1109), a widely influential medieval philosopher and theologian, held the office of Archbishop of Canterbury from 1093 to 1109. Called the founder of Scholasticism, he is famous as the inventor of the ontological argument for the existence of God.

Writings

Anselm may, with some justice, be considered the first scholastic philosopher and theologian. His only great predecessor, Scotus Erigena, had more of the speculative and mystical element than is consistent with a schoolman; but in Anselm are found that recognition of the relation of reason to revealed truth, and that attempt to elaborate a rational system of faith, which form the special characteristics of scholastic thought. His constant endeavour is to render the contents of the Christian consciousness clear to reason, and to develop the intelligible truths interwoven with the Christian belief. The necessary preliminary for this is the possession of the Christian consciousness. "He who does not believe will not experience; and he who has not experienced will not understand."

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

That faith must precede knowledge is reiterated by him. "Negue enim quaero intelligere ut credam, sed credo ut intelligam. Nam et hoc credo, quia, nisi credidero, non intelligam." ("Nor do I seek to understand that I may believe, but I believe that I may understand. For this too I believe, that unless I first believe, I shall not understand.") But after the faith is held fast, the attempt must be made to demonstrate by reason the truth of what we believe. It is wrong not to do so. "Negligentiae mihi esse videtur, si, postquam confirmati sumus in fide, non studemus quod credimus, intelligere." ("I hold it to be a failure in duty if after we have become steadfast in the faith we do not strive to understand what we believe.") To such an extent does he carry this demand for rational explanation that, at times, it seems as if he claimed for unassisted intelligence the power of penetrating even to the mysteries of the Christian faith. On the whole, however, the qualified statement is his real view; merely rational proofs are always, he affirms, to be tested by Scripture. (Cur Deus homo, i. 2 and 38; De Fide Trin. 2.)The groundwork of his theory of knowledge is contained in the tract De Veritate, in which, from the consideration of truth as in knowledge, in willing, and in things, he rises to the affirmation of an absolute truth, in which all other truth participates. This absolute truth is God himself, who is therefore the ultimate ground or principle both of things and of thought. The notion of God comes thus into the foreground of the system; before all things it is necessary that it should be made clear to reason, that it should be demonstrated to have real existence. This demonstration is the substance of the Monologion and Proslogion. In the first of these the proof rests on the ordinary grounds of realism, and coincides to some extent with the earlier theory of Augustine, though it is carried out with singular boldness and fulness. Things, he says, are called good in a variety of ways and degrees; this would be impossible if there were not some absolute standard, some good in itself, in which all relative goods participate. Similarly with such predicates as great, just; they involve a certain greatness and justice. The very existence of things is impossible without some one Being, by whom they are. This absolute Being, this goodness, justice, greatness, is God. Anselm was not thoroughly satisfied with this reasoning; it started from a posteriori grounds, and contained several converging lines of proof. He desired to have some one short demonstration. Such a demonstration he presented in the Proslogion; it is his celebrated ontological proof. God is that being than whom none greater can be conceived. Now, if that than which nothing greater can be conceived existed only in the intellect, it would not be the absolutely greatest, for we could add to it existence in reality. It follows, then, that the being than whom nothing greater can be conceived, i.e. God, necessarily has real existence. This reasoning, in which Anselm partially anticipated the Cartesian philosophers, has rarely seemed satisfactory. It was opposed at the time by the monk Gaunilo, in his Liber pro Insipiente, on the ground that we cannot pass from idea to reality. The same criticism is made by several of the later schoolmen, among others by Aquinas, and is in substance what Kant advances against all ontological proof. Anselm replied to the objections of Gaunilo in his Liber Apologeticus. The existence of God being thus held proved, he proceeds to state the rational grounds of the Christian doctrines of creation and of the Trinity. With reference to this last, he says we cannot know God from himself, but only after the analogy of his creatures; and the special analogy used is the self-consciousness of man, its peculiar double nature, with the necessary elements, memory and intelligence, representing the relation of the Father to the Son. The mutual love of these two, proceeding from the relation they hold to one another, symbolizes the Holy Spirit. The further theological doctrines of man, original sin, free will, are developed, partly in the Monologion, partly in other mixed treatises. Finally, in his greatest work, Cur Deus homo, he undertakes to make plain, even to infidels, the rational necessity of the Christian mystery of the atonement. The theory rests on three positions: that satisfaction is necessary on account of God's honour and justice; that such satisfaction can be given only by the peculiar personality of the God-man; that such satisfaction is really given by the voluntary death of this infinitely valuable person. The demonstration is, in brief, this. All the actions of men are due to the furtherance of God's glory; if, then, there be sin, i.e. if God's honour be wounded, man of himself can give no satisfaction. But the justice of God demands satisfaction; and as an insult to infinite honour is in itself infinite, the satisfaction must be infinite, i.e. it must outweigh all that is not God. Such a penalty can only be paid by God himself, and, as a penalty for man, must be paid under the form of man. Satisfaction is only possible through the God-man. Now this God-man, as sinless, is exempt from the punishment of sin; His passion is therefore voluntary, not given as due. The merit of it is therefore infinite; God's justice is thus appeased, and His mercy may extend to man. This theory has exercised immense influence on the form of church doctrine. It is certainly an advance on the older patristic theory, in so far as it substitutes for a contest between God and Satan, a contest between the goodness and justice of God; but it puts the whole relation on a merely legal footing, gives it no ethical bearing, and neglects altogether the consciousness of the individual to be redeemed. In this respect it contrasts unfavourably with the later theory of Abelard.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Philosophers perhaps think of Anselm primarily as the author of the ontological argument for the existence of God. However, the term ontological was first applied to such arguments by Kant, and it is the subject of debate whether Anselm's argument is an ontological argument at all. Anselm also authored a number of other arguments for the existence of God, based on cosmological and teleological grounds.

Related Topics:
Ontological argument - Kant - Cosmological - Teleological

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Anselm was the first Christian theologian to develop a detailed atonement theory in the history of Western theology. His atonement system, known as the Satisfaction or Commercial Theory of Atonement, is articulated in his work, Cur Deus Homo? ("Why did God become Man?"). In it, Anselm sought to answer the question of why God became a man. He did so based on his understanding of sin and the need for the atonement. Influenced by medieval views of honor, Anselm believed that the essence of sin is the failure to give God the honor due Him. Sin robs God of His honor, which must be vindicated. Since God is so great, humans cannot vindicate God's honor simply by repenting and beginning to honor Him, for their sin has not only robbed God of honor, but has injured Him. Thus, in addition to rectifying the situation of failing to honor God, reparation for the injury must also be made.

Related Topics:
Atonement - Theology - Sin - Medieval - Honor

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

God's honor could be satisfied by punishment (of humans) or by satisfaction (of God's honor). Due to God's mercy or due to the need to save some humans to compensate God for the loss of the fallen angels, God chose to satisfy His honor through the death of Jesus. Jesus completely obeyed the law, but this was his duty so it did not garner any merit. However, since he was sinless, he was not obliged to suffer and die. His suffering and death brought great glory to God and merited great reward. Since Jesus did not need any merit (he was sinless), his merit could be passed on to sinful humans in the form of forgiveness and future blessings. This provided the necessary reparation to God. This model provides the basis for the Roman Catholic concept of the treasury of merit.

Related Topics:
Mercy - Angel - Jesus - Forgiveness - Roman Catholic - Treasury of merit

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Anselm's speculations did not receive, in the middle ages, the respect and attention justly their due. This was probably due to their unsystematic character, for they are generally tracts or dialogues on detached questions, not elaborate treatises like the great works of Albert, Aquinas, and Erigena. They have, however, a freshness and philosophical vigour, which more than makes up for their want of system, and which raises them far above the level of most scholastic writings.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Major Works

:Monologion (1076)

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:Proslogion (1077–1078)

Related Topics:
1077 - 1078

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:Cur Deus Homo (1098)

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Other works

:De grammatico (1075–1085)

Related Topics:
1075 - 1085

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:De veritate (1080–1085)

Related Topics:
1080 - 1085

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:De libertate arbitrii (1080–1085)

Related Topics:
1080 - 1085

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:De casu diaboli (1085–1090)

Related Topics:
1085 - 1090

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:De Epistola de incarnatione verbi (1092 1st version ; 1094 final version)

Related Topics:
1092 - 1094

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:De conceptu virginali et originali peccato (1099–1100)

Related Topics:
1099 - 1100

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:Meditatio redemptionis humanae (1099–1100)

Related Topics:
1099 - 1100

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:De processione spiritus sancti (1102)

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:Epistolae de sacramentis (Epistola de sacrificio azymi et fermentati and Epistola de sacramentis ecclesiae) (1106–1107)

Related Topics:
1106 - 1107

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

:De concordia praescientiae et praedestinationis et gratiae dei cum libero arbitrio (1107–1108)

Related Topics:
1107 - 1108

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~