Affair of the diamond necklace

The Affair of the diamond necklace was a mysterious incident in the 1780s at the court of Louis XVI of France involving the queen Marie Antoinette. It concerned an unsavoury episode in which the wife of Louis XVI, Marie Antoinette, whose reputation was already tarnished by gossip and scandal, was implicated in a crime by contemporary public opinion. The Affair was historically significant as one of the events that led to the French populace's disillusionment with the monarchy, which eventually culminated in the French Revolution.

The Story

A con-woman called Jeanne de St Remy de Valois conceived of a plan to gain herself wealth through the necklace and possibly power and royal patronage. A descendant of a bastard of Henry II of France, Jeanne de Valois, after many adventures, had married a soi-disant comte de Lamotte, and lived on a small pension which the king granted her.

Related Topics:
Jeanne de St Remy de Valois - Henry II of France - Comte de Lamotte

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In March 1784 she entered into relations with the Cardinal Louis de Rohan, formerly ambassador to Vienna. The Cardinal was regarded with displeasure by Marie Antoinette, having revealed some of her secrets to Maria Theresa of Austria, the empress of Vienna and Marie's mother, bringing a maternal reprimand. The queen also learned of a letter in which the cardinal spoke lightly of Maria Theresa in a way that offended Marie.

Related Topics:
1784 - Louis de Rohan - Vienna - Maria Theresa of Austria

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The cardinal was attempting to regain the favour of the queen in his quest for the position of prime minister. The Cardinal claims that he was duped by Jeanne de Valois (an account later accepted by a French court).

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Valois persuaded him that she had been received by the queen and enjoyed her favour; and Rohan resolved to use her to regain the queen's goodwill. The comtesse de Lamotte assured the cardinal that she was making efforts on his behalf.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

This was the beginning of a pretended correspondence between Rohan and the queen, the adventuress duly returning replies to Rohan's notes, which she affirmed to come from the queen. The tone of the letters became very warm, and the cardinal, convinced that Marie Antoinette was in love with him, became ardently enamoured of her. He begged the countess to obtain a secret interview for him with the queen, and a meeting took place in August 1784 in a grove in the garden at Versailles between him and a lady whom the cardinal believed to be the queen herself. Rohan offered her a rose, and she promised him that she would forget the past. Later a certain Marie Lejay (renamed by the comtesse "Baronne Gay d'Oliva", the last word being apparently an anagram of Valoi), who resembled Marie Antoinette, stated that she had been engaged to play the role of queen in this comedy.

Related Topics:
Versailles - Anagram

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The countess profited by the cardinal's conviction to borrow from him sums of money destined ostensibly for the queen?s works of charity. Enriched by these, the countess was able to take an honourable place in society, and many persons believed her relations with Marie Antoinette, of which she boasted openly and unreservedly, to be genuine. It is still an unsettled question whether she simply mystified people, or whether she was really employed by the queen for some unknown purpose, perhaps to ruin the cardinal.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

In any case the jewellers Boehmer and Bassenge believed in the relations of the countess with the queen, and they resolved to use her to sell their necklace. She at first refused their commission, then accepted it.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

On January 21 1785 the Countess de Lamotte announced that the queen would buy the necklace, but that not wishing to treat directly, she would use a high person as an intermediary. A little while later Rohan came to negotiate the purchase of the famous necklace for the 1,600,000 livres, payable in installments. He claimed to have the queen's authorisation, and showed the jewellers the conditions of the bargain approved in the handwriting of Marie Antoinette. The necklace was given up. Rohan took it to the countess' house, where a man, in whom Rohan believed he recognized a valet of the queen, came to fetch it.

Related Topics:
January 21 - 1785

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

Shortly afterwards, the "comte de Lamotte" appears to have started at once for London, it is said with the necklace, which he broke up in order to sell the stones.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

When the time came to pay, the comtesse de Lamotte presented the cardinal's notes; but these were insufficient, and Boehmer complained to the queen, who told him that she had received no necklace and had never ordered it. She had the story of the negotiations repeated for her. Then followed a coup de théatre. On August 15 1785, Assumption Day, when the whole court was awaiting the king and queen in order to go to the chapel, the cardinal de Rohan, who was preparing to officiate, was arrested and taken to the Bastille. He was able, however, to destroy the correspondence exchanged, as he thought, with the queen, and it is not known whether there was any connivance of the officials, who did not prevent this, or not. The comtesse de Lamotte was not arrested until August 18 1785, after having destroyed her papers.

Related Topics:
August 15 - 1785 - Assumption Day - Bastille - August 18

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The police set to work to find all her accomplices, and arrested the girl Oliva and a certain Reteaux de Villette, a friend of the countess, who confessed that he had written the letters given to Rohan in the queen's name, and had imitated her signature on the conditions of the bargain. The famous charlatan Cagliostro was also arrested, but it was recognised that he had taken no part in the affair.

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

The cardinal de Rohan accepted the parlement of Paris as judges. A sensational trial resulted (May 31 1786) in the acquittal of the cardinal, of the girl Oliva and of Cagliostro. The comtesse de Lamotte was condemned to be whipped, branded and shut up in the prostitutes' prison, the Salpêtrière. Her husband was condemned, in his absence, to the galleys for life. Villette was banished.

Related Topics:
Parlement - May 31 - 1786 - Whipped - Branded - Salpêtrière - Galley

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~